In today's age, unfollowing the news will give you a peace of mind. News entertains, it dances with sensationalism and highlights disappointing stories. ‘As it turns out, your hobby of monitoring the “state of the world” did not actually affect the world,' blogs David Cain in his piece ‘Five Things You Notice When You Quit the News.'
The news is candy for the mind. There's little currency in meta-truth and more credibility in depth. Books will always be more dependable than the news. The future is apt to repeat the past because people never learned the history taught in books in the first place.
‘If we only care about the breadth of information, and not the depth, there’s not much distinction between “staying informed” and staying misinformed.'
People substitute care with attention, thinking that knowing the latest news on Aleppo shows genuine concern. Their opinions on the issue tip-toe around ideal resolutions without doing anything about it.
‘The sense of “at least I care” may actually prevent us from doing something concrete to help, because by watching sympathetically we don’t quite have to confront the reality that we’re doing absolutely nothing about it.'
It doesn't matter how well-informed you are because you won't do anything to ameliorate the situation. You don't need more news to fill your echo chamber of partisanship; you need to listen with intent.
It's not even worth consuming the news at all. While that may sound callous, to “remain uninvolved without feeling uninvolved,” can bring focus to the things where you can actually make a difference.